Qodo vs Macroscope: Features, Pricing and User Reviews 2026
What are Qodo and Macroscope?
Qodo is an AI-powered code review and quality platform built for teams that ship a lot of code, including code written by AI coding assistants like Copilot and Cursor. It reads your full codebase and history, not just the changed lines, to find bugs, security gaps, missing tests, and rule violations before they reach production.
Instead of one generic bot, Qodo uses several specialized AI agents that work together to review pull requests, check code against your team's own coding standards, and explain issues in plain language with ready-to-use fixes.
It works inside your IDE while you code, inside your Git provider on every pull request, and from the command line for automation. A central dashboard shows leaders where risk is building up and how well standards are being followed.
Qodo can run as a regular cloud service, a private single-tenant instance, or fully on your own servers, which makes it a fit for teams with strict security or compliance needs.
Macroscope is an AI tool built for engineering teams that work on GitHub. It reviews every pull request, points out real bugs, and writes clear summaries of what changed in the code.
It works by reading code as a graph instead of just plain text, so it understands how files and functions connect to each other. It also connects to tools like Slack, Jira, and Linear for extra context.
Teams can also ask a built in agent questions about the codebase, get weekly reports, and set up simple automations. New users get $100 in free usage to try the product before paying anything.
Features of Qodo and Macroscope
Multi-agent AI code review across full codebase
Living rules system for coding standards
Real-time review inside the IDE
Cross-repo breaking change detection
Governance and risk dashboard
CLI automation and CI/CD integration
Works with GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps
Zero data retention and SOC 2 Type II
SSO, audit logs, and on-prem deployment
Free 14-day trial, no credit card needed
Automatic pull request reviews with real bug detection
Auto fixes and auto approves safe changes
Codebase mapped as a connected graph
Weekly status digests and commit summaries
Built in agent for Slack and GitHub
Simple automations called Macros
Local CLI and webhook API access
Connects to Jira, Linear, Sentry, and more
SOC 2 Type II certified security
Use Cases of Qodo and Macroscope
Pricing of Qodo and Macroscope
Qodo offers a simple, credit-based pricing model built around a Pro Team plan and a custom Enterprise plan.
Free 14-Day Trial: No credit card needed, with unlimited reviews and unlimited credits for two weeks.
Pro Team ($30 to $240/month): Credits cost $0.012 each and are pooled across the whole team. Packs run from about 2,500 credits (roughly 18 reviews) up to 20,000 credits (roughly 144 reviews) a month, with no annual commitment, no rate limits, and the option to switch packs anytime.
Enterprise (Custom pricing): Built for organizations with 30 or more users. It includes everything in Pro Team plus SSO/SAML, audit logs, bring-your-own LLM keys, single-tenant or on-prem deployment, priority support, and a dedicated customer success manager.
Whether you are a small team or a large enterprise, Qodo's pricing scales with how many code reviews you actually need.
Macroscope uses a usage based pricing model instead of one flat monthly fee. You only pay for what you actually use.
Agent: Costs $0.01 per credit, with 1,000 credits included each month.
Code Review: Costs $0.05 per KB of code reviewed, with a 10 KB minimum per review.
Status: Costs $0.05 per commit tracked and summarized.
The Teams plan gives every new account $100 of free usage to try Code Review, Status, and the Agent before paying anything, along with tools to set spend limits.
The Enterprise plan includes everything in Teams, plus discounted pricing for longer commitments, priority support, custom legal agreements, and a SOC 2 Type II report. Enterprise pricing is custom and requires contacting sales.
FAQs: Qodo vs Macroscope
Reviews: Qodo vs Macroscope
Based on 0 reviews
Based on 0 reviews
Compare Qodo With Other Tools
Greptile
AI Code Review for Every Pull Request
CodeRabbit
AI-Powered Code Review for Teams
Bugbot
AI Powered Code Review Agent by Cursor
Cubic
Smarter AI Code Reviews for Dev Teams
Codacy
Code Quality & Security for AI Teams
Sourcery
AI Code Review & Security Scanning
CodeAnt AI
Agentic Code & Security Platform
DeepSource
AI Code Review & Security Platform
Graphite
AI Code Review for Faster PR Merges
Compare Macroscope With Other Tools
CodeRabbit
AI-Powered Code Review for Teams
Greptile
AI Code Review for Every Pull Request
CodeAnt AI
Agentic Code & Security Platform
Bugbot
AI Powered Code Review Agent by Cursor
Cubic
Smarter AI Code Reviews for Dev Teams
Codacy
Code Quality & Security for AI Teams
DeepSource
AI Code Review & Security Platform
Sourcery
AI Code Review & Security Scanning
Graphite
AI Code Review for Faster PR Merges




